Aaron Hill fe13789345 Use Pin<Box<S>> in BodyStream and SizedStream (#1328) ... Fixes #1321 A better fix would be to change `MessageBody` to take a `Pin<&mut Self>`, rather than a `Pin<&mut Self>`. This will avoid requiring the use of `Box` for all consumers by allowing the caller to determine how to pin the `MessageBody` implementation (e.g. via stack pinning). However, doing so is a breaking change that will affect every user of `MessageBody`. By pinning the inner stream ourselves, we can fix the undefined behavior without breaking the API. I've included @sebzim4500's reproduction case as a new test case. However, due to the nature of undefined behavior, this could pass (and not segfault) even if underlying issue were to regress. Unfortunately, until rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines#148 is resolved, it's not even possible to write a Miri test that will pass when the bug is fixed. Co-authored-by: Yuki Okushi <huyuumi.dev@gmail.com>		2020-01-31 09:39:34 +09:00
..
cert.pem	drop unpin constraint	2019-11-21 16:02:17 +06:00
key.pem	drop unpin constraint	2019-11-21 16:02:17 +06:00
test_httpserver.rs	Rename HttpServer::start() to HttpServer::run()	2019-12-22 17:12:22 +04:00
test_server.rs	rename App::register_data to App::app_data and HttpRequest::app_data returns Option<&T> instead of Option<&Data<T>>	2019-12-20 17:13:09 +06:00
test_weird_poll.rs	Use Pin<Box<S>> in BodyStream and SizedStream (#1328)	2020-01-31 09:39:34 +09:00