diff --git a/work/01paper.pdf b/work/01paper.pdf
index f8e7311..2adc218 100644
Binary files a/work/01paper.pdf and b/work/01paper.pdf differ
diff --git a/work/01paper.tex b/work/01paper.tex
index fbd454b..b2773c6 100644
--- a/work/01paper.tex
+++ b/work/01paper.tex
@@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ vulnerabilities or at least application crashes.
 
 \subsection{Background}\label{ref:background}
 
+\subsubsection{Technical Details}
+
 Exploitation of buffer overflow vulnerabilities almost always works by
 overriding the return address in the current stack frame, so when the `ret`
 instruction is executed, an attacker controlled address is moved into the
@@ -86,6 +88,8 @@ that, if a linked function is called, an attacker controlled function is called
 instead, or (in C++) overriding the vtable where the pointers to an object's
 methods are stored.
 
+\subsubsection{Implications}
+
 \subsection{Concept and Methods}\label{ref:concept}
 
 \subsubsection{Runtime Bounds Checks}
@@ -153,9 +157,13 @@ circumvent the w\^{}x protection.
 
 \subsubsection{Ineffective or Inefficient}
 
+Methods that have been shown to be ineffective (e.g. can be circumvented easily)
+or inefficient (to much runtime overhead)...
+
 \subsubsection{State of the Art}
 
-text
+What techniques are currently used?
+
 
 \section{Conclusion and Outlook}\label{ref:conclusion}